it looks like Grits for Breakfast is right on the money w/that revised Fourth Amendment ... My CrimPro textbook says so!I'd settled on a different version. Orin Kerr, who had a great early post on the Caballes decision at the Volokh Conspiracy, disagreed in the comments, and I responded. Check it out, if you haven't heard enough venting yet about drug sniffing dogs not constituting a search.
Saturday, January 29, 2005
'On the money,' ambivalently
The second year law student behind Ambivalent Imbroglio preferred my suggestion for a revised Fourth Amendment offered up in this rant.