tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post205738460748388742..comments2024-03-15T05:45:01.402-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: 'Scent lineup' evidence may be used in Anthony Graves' capital caseGritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-80423502823579212422009-10-20T08:44:14.043-05:002009-10-20T08:44:14.043-05:007:30/7:58 - Junk forensics like lie detectors and ...7:30/7:58 - Junk forensics like lie detectors and scent lineups are dangerous to the public. If they accuse the wrong person, it's not just that an innocent person can be punished, the guilty go free.<br /><br />I'm glad science is beginning to evaluate outdated forensic methods. It's long overdue and in the end the justice system will be better as a result.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-42968500497579049312009-10-20T07:58:40.953-05:002009-10-20T07:58:40.953-05:00i feel this case has gone way out of context it ap...i feel this case has gone way out of context it appears that one team is fighting the other in trying to say who will win, and no one is focusing on is this man a murder or not i mean did he really do this and if he didn't can you prove he didn't or can you prove that the state has no evidence to prove he did what is most important at this point all i know is anthony has been saying he didn't do this from the beganing how and why would robert carter lie on him why would he make a deal with the state about not bring his wife in if would testify against anthony how did he come up with his name and if his wife wasn't in this why would he make such a deal even if it is true or not i think the pressure should be on his wife that is when the whole truth and nothing but the truth will come out and we all will see these people for who they really are they all are killers and need to burn in hell for what they done to those innocent helpless people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-86317974600696656942009-10-20T07:30:47.495-05:002009-10-20T07:30:47.495-05:00wow i just don't understand it seems like ever...wow i just don't understand it seems like every test that anthony graves takes it is something wrong with the test first it was the lie detector test that he failed twice then it was the line up with the dogs its something wrong because it is 17 years old and it comes from a burned house what next i mean how many excuses or you guys going to come up with before you see this man for who he really is i know what will work take a moment out your busy day and get on your knees ask God that is if you know him ask God to show you this man for who he is. oh and lets see now when was robert carter telling the truth was it the 1st story he told or the 2nd one i often wonder why would robert lie on poor little anthony whom he says he didn't even know but yet he was very close cousin with cookie roberts wife and you don't know her husband okay out of all the people in this great big world anthonys name just drops out the sky why they both lied and anthony is still lieing he is really making you all look like dummies up there defending him and he knows what he has done oh and one more question or you all trying to prove that anthony is not guilty because you say the state has no evidence or because he is innocent can you prove that he is innocent instead of trying to prove that the state can't prove that he is guilty oh i know wish way it is suppose to go the state has the burden of proof but will that say that he is innocent or are you fighting to let a man out that really killed those poor little babies how could you live with your selves if that was to happen and he gets out and kill again oh because given that chance he will kill again be careful and prove his innocence not rather the state can't prove he is guilty is he really innocence thats my question? can you prove thatAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-7751499639750714402009-10-15T15:09:16.271-05:002009-10-15T15:09:16.271-05:00Nonetheless, prosecutors including with the Texas ...Nonetheless, prosecutors including with the Texas Attorney General's Office – <br /><br />The TX AG's interpretation of state law and of the policies and practices of state agencies is valuable and that is part of the job, but it seems these decisions are more and more being questioned and the office must take a defensive posture; almost one of defend our decision at all costs. It is as if they are saying, "we couldn't possibly be wrong". Perhaps we need to look closely when the election for the AG position comes up for vote.Texas Mavericknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-86534647064133349332009-10-15T11:52:24.024-05:002009-10-15T11:52:24.024-05:00So if Mr. Pikett claims a "match" on 17 ...So if Mr. Pikett claims a "match" on 17 year-old burned evidence shouldn't that fact itself be proof that Mr. Pikett's technique is full of poo. Might as well using a diving rod.Karonoreply@blogger.com