tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post3858443090569097370..comments2024-03-15T05:45:01.402-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: CCA: Junk science writ covers bad scientists as well as bad scienceGritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-65927041366391089482015-06-06T09:36:58.203-05:002015-06-06T09:36:58.203-05:00Not a timely reply, however a few of us Forensic O...Not a timely reply, however a few of us Forensic Odontologists argue today that the "identification science" of bite mark analysis to purport to name a suspect, is erroneous.Doc MBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16925268810383797107noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-26848193176162389312014-12-01T13:23:34.868-06:002014-12-01T13:23:34.868-06:00I'm not sure that it doesn't, 12:02. The C...I'm not sure that it doesn't, 12:02. The CCA appears to have used it to grant <a href="http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2014/11/not-just-movie-magic-why-cca-released.html" rel="nofollow">Bernie Tiede</a> a new sentencing hearing because an expert gave false testimony.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-1414528745294977302014-12-01T12:02:13.135-06:002014-12-01T12:02:13.135-06:00It's a pity that the statute does not extend t...It's a pity that the statute does not extend to wrongful sentences as well, given that a good deal of the junk science in Texas cases has been the use of e.g. spurious "predictions" of future dangerousness in capital cases. Anyone talking to their legislator about that anomaly? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com