tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post8198523535724204146..comments2024-03-25T20:06:39.794-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: What happens to people convicted under now-unconstitutional online solicitation statute?Gritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-13752582915634486132014-03-19T10:02:34.649-05:002014-03-19T10:02:34.649-05:00The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Denied the Sta...The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Denied the States motion for rehearing and Greg Abbotts power hungry move to intervene today. This statute is done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-67158551415367104792014-03-15T09:43:25.943-05:002014-03-15T09:43:25.943-05:00How can this ruling be ignored? I was convicted un...How can this ruling be ignored? I was convicted under this statute in 2011. 5 months after the ruling I am still a registered sex offender with no prior criminal history. I maintained that I had no criminal intent all along. I just want to get what's left of my life back and rejoin my family in New Mexico.Steven Arnoldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-51158445017599810072013-11-01T19:49:10.531-05:002013-11-01T19:49:10.531-05:00Regrettably, Conradt is still dead, so no reprieve...Regrettably, Conradt is still dead, so no reprieve for all that were screwed over.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-78700771602428079052013-11-01T13:24:17.753-05:002013-11-01T13:24:17.753-05:00Here's a question for you, these people are ab...Here's a question for you, these people are able to file a habeas corpus because of the fact that the law was unconstitutional than their arrest, conviction and confinement was also illegal under the law that they were imprisoned. That means that they should be able to file a title 42 USC 1983 action for false imprisonment of this could run into millions of dollars Per individual depending on the length of confinement <br /><br />It would appear that it would be in the state's best interest to automatically go back and release these people. And offer some type of compensation with the guarantee of not and a new charges being filed. Because even if new charges Were filed. The 1983 action would still go forward costing the state millions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-46682163722054774952013-11-01T11:19:52.442-05:002013-11-01T11:19:52.442-05:00My takeaway from this exchange is that District At...My takeaway from this exchange is that District Attorneys around the state now should be obligated to go back and re-examine their old cases to identify all defendants who've been convicted of... <br /><br />Grits, I wish someone like you or Mr. Bennett would say this in a future Posting regarding the folks not only *claiming but *having verifiable proof / evidence they were arrested for a Fake Outstanding Traffic Warrant. Doing so, without waiting on the CCA or anyone else to agree that it's unconstituional to fake police incident reports. In the words of the great Prof. Protess, Thanks in advance.<br /><br />Until then,<br />I couldn't locate the Post regarding emails being searched without warrants so please allow this. If the authorities can legally shift through regular ol citizens emails along side of actual bad guys, then it also must be legal to knock (down) on doors and go through the file cabinets full of regular U.S. Mail: telephone, utility bills, birthday cards and letters from grandma. Sounds stupid and all but I've put it out there just the same. <br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com