tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post4502251587501199691..comments2024-03-25T20:06:39.794-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: Court of Criminal Appeals judges call out colleagues for judicial activism on TX junk science writGritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-34625132543855010172016-02-04T06:25:51.347-06:002016-02-04T06:25:51.347-06:00He is a guilty POS and Tristens mother will be pre...He is a guilty POS and Tristens mother will be present at any bond hearing or any other court date he has.. You people don't realize that Mr. Robbins caught a lucky break that the other POS in this case Patricia Moore performed Tristens autopsy.. What we should really discuss is Robbins behavior the day Tristen was murdered... Or how he has multiple explanations for her death.. Really?? I mean which was it toxic mold or maybe those COUPLE of stuffed animals in her bed or no no wait it must of been his mother.. Of course that one was convieniently after his mother died ... So wake up people , anyone charged with such a horrific thing would say I am innocent because even convicts in prison don't like baby killers or rapist... So world know this I will fight to make sure he is found guilty again... I have seen convictions with less than what the state has now... Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-50028718134367361412016-01-28T20:43:24.558-06:002016-01-28T20:43:24.558-06:00He is at Stiles Unit waiting for transit to take h...He is at Stiles Unit waiting for transit to take him to Montgomery County for his Court date in mid Feb. He is a innocent man and the truth will set him free!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-40472344326105030812016-01-28T11:20:42.806-06:002016-01-28T11:20:42.806-06:00Where is Neal Hampton Robbins now? Is he out or im...Where is Neal Hampton Robbins now? Is he out or imprisoned?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-87892258724401272712016-01-28T07:58:05.331-06:002016-01-28T07:58:05.331-06:00It is confusing. Alcala's opinion walks throug...It is confusing. Alcala's opinion walks through it all.<br /><br />Lege passed a law in 2013 that the court 5-4 interpreted broadly. Then 3 of the 5 were replaced with new judges, two of which voted for the state's motion to reconsider under the newly constituted court. In 2015, the Lege passed a bill codifying the court's ruling. But instead of deciding the motion for rehearing under the new law, there were now 5 judges opposed - one (Meyers) thinks the Lege simply has no constitutional authority to legislate habeas, while the others apparently just disagreed with the Legislature and prefer to substitute their own judgments. So, they simply dismissed the motion for rehearing, which gave relief to Robbins but prevented the court from establishing precedent.<br /><br />Reading tea leaves, Judge Cheryl Johnson is leaving the court and Meyers will lose in November (he switched parties and is running as a Democrat). So the four likely are hoping that they'll gain allies on the court soon and by the time another case on this reaches them, they'll have the votes to simply issue a de facto judicial veto and neuter the new law regardless of what the Legislature intends. That's how I read the vote, anyway.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-29209284516926108942016-01-28T04:23:25.755-06:002016-01-28T04:23:25.755-06:00This time I am confused. GFB, can you share in rea...This time I am confused. GFB, can you share in really plain language what's going on? Just one or two sentences an unsophisticated lay person like me can understand. Thank-you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com