tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post519327924369525102..comments2024-03-25T20:06:39.794-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: 'Not guilty,' said the jury; 'go to prison,' said the parole board - examining the limits of eyewitness testimonyGritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-48492876936159481462007-08-05T14:37:00.000-05:002007-08-05T14:37:00.000-05:00My brother was found not guilty for a robbery and ...My brother was found not guilty for a robbery and it was witness that stated he had nothing to do with the robbery but the boy that was with him did. My brother did go to jail for robbery 5 years ago and served his time but this one he was not involved with. Now the jury found him not guilty but the judge to it upon himself to handle his V.O.P and gave him 20 years for violation of probation and he had another judge that suppose to have handled that case and another public defender. Can anyone point my family in the right direction of who to talk to. Please email me at bwhitelm@yahoo.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-40828558551732660812007-08-05T14:21:00.000-05:002007-08-05T14:21:00.000-05:00My brother was found not guilty for a robbery and ...My brother was found not guilty for a robbery and it was witness that stated he had nothing to do with the robbery but the boy that was with him did. My brother did go to jail for robbery 5 years ago and served his time but this one he was not involved with. Now the jury found him not guilty but the judge to it upon himself to handle his V.O.P and gave him 20 years for violation of probation and he had another judge that suppose to have handled that case and another public defender. Can anyone point my family in the right direction of who to talk to.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-75613021894437366862007-04-24T01:01:00.000-05:002007-04-24T01:01:00.000-05:00Bottom line is, if someone is found innocent, they...Bottom line is, if someone is found innocent, they should not do any extra time for the charge. The Parole Board should not have that power, and I cant believe that they are allowed to get away with it. <BR/><BR/>And inmate sent back to prison for something he is found not guilty of is likely to be having a considerable amount of bad hair days, and thus could be a danger to COs, so it's in the COs interests that it doesnt happen as well. Its not just a probation issue.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-34661055187288022102007-04-23T19:59:00.000-05:002007-04-23T19:59:00.000-05:00now i KNOW i was right to turn down parole and do ...now i KNOW i was right to turn down parole and do my time flat!!billthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05631609235873230282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-71344050450252771852007-04-23T18:34:00.000-05:002007-04-23T18:34:00.000-05:00frqbi..not trying to be combative because I think ...frqbi..not trying to be combative because I think we are on the same page; however, once you are an ex-felon the treatment you receive in the freeworld is as bad for one conviction or five convictions. If the new conviction is longer that what is left on the first sentence the revocation is a moot point. <BR/>I do agree that some felons do reoffend, without question. But many are sent back on technical violations, not new crimes.<BR/>Also, if they are charged with a crime, found NOT guilty, and the parole board still rovokes them....well, don't you see something wrong with this picture??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-70511643071225209972007-04-23T10:49:00.000-05:002007-04-23T10:49:00.000-05:00There are times - and situations - in which it is ...There are times - and situations - in which it is better in the long run for a parolee to have a revocation than yet another conviction on his criminal record. Presuming that the individual did commit the intervening offense (which does happen at times), is it better to be convicted AND revoked, or simply revoked?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-2186722395257048972007-04-23T10:36:00.000-05:002007-04-23T10:36:00.000-05:00To frqbi....what you are,in fact saying is, the co...To frqbi....what you are,in fact saying is, the country saves the cost of a trial and the compromise is the freedom of the parolee. Seems that everyone wins but the parolee who is sent back to the dungeon, who has lost ALL street time, and who will remain in prison until hell freezes over or his/her sentence is done day for day. He/she becomes part of the recidivism numbers that the parole board loves to cram down the throats of anyone who complains about the repetative excuses they give for denying parole. Trust me, once TDCJ gets a parolee back on a parole revocation, they chew nails to keep them for as long as they can. Thus, the county saved their money, the parole board got their wish, and the only one that has to suffer is the convicted felon who will rot in the abyss called TDCJ.<BR/>..and to our good friend Grits,when it comes to justified; there is nothing justified about the parole board in this state.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-10854091671181423052007-04-23T07:16:00.000-05:002007-04-23T07:16:00.000-05:00@frqbi - Good point. I can see where that might ha...@frqbi - Good point. I can see where that might happen sometimes with dismissed charges, but I can't imagine ANY situation where the parole board is justified overturning a jury verdict.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-75298771906027947352007-04-23T07:02:00.000-05:002007-04-23T07:02:00.000-05:00There are times, however, that this result is part...There are times, however, that this result is part of a compromise. The State agrees to dismiss a charge that it could prove contingent on the parolee agreeing to revocation. <BR/><BR/>In many cases, this means that the parolee gets out of County (a place few like to be - especially if rural!). The County avoids the cost of the trial, and, in the long run, the parolee is out faster.<BR/><BR/>This kind of agreement is not an effort to get around jury trials or to bypass justice; it is the result of understaffed offices and the simple fact that no prosecutor's office can try every case filed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-37909775916766325192007-04-23T04:57:00.000-05:002007-04-23T04:57:00.000-05:00Sunray's Wench...if it were only that easy I would...Sunray's Wench...if it were only that easy I would lead the choir at any given parole office or prison unit. I've met some excellent PO's and I've met some that their whole world revolved around the word "revocation." The good ones usually move on and go to a more rewarding job position while the not so good ones continue to degrade and dehumanize their parolees, hoping for the day they can be part of the process of sending them back to prison where they will also be degraded and dehumanized.<BR/>Least we all forget, even if the PO sits in the local hearing and says the parolee should NOT return to prison, the illustrious demi-gods and goddesses sitting on the Big Brother Parole Board have the final say. I can almost see the saliva running down their chins as they get the chance to return a parolee to prison so they can cry, "Aha! Recidivism again!" I have personally heard a parole officer say, while in an angry rage over a D.A.'s decision not to charge another felony on a parolee, "Just watch...he is going back to prison. I will see to that!" Kind of makes you warm and tingly inside, doesn't it.<BR/>I've asked a parole officer in charge of tracking parolees on monitors if there is ever a problem with the monitors. The answer was NO, they NEVER have a problem with the monitors, only the parolees. (We can't take into consideration these same monitors are man-made and are therefore subject to error) I watched a parolee almost vomit in fear as his monitor just popped off his ankle one day. Thank God for a quick thinking mother and a parole supervisor who stayed at the office after hours to fix the problem. Others have not been so lucky when their monitor popped off....they were returned to prison by their over zealous PO.<BR/>Until the Texas Legislators stand up and say that enough is enough, and unless they provide Texas with an oversight committee to police our broken parole board, the prisons will continue to be over crowded with parolees back on a revocation...be it new crime for which they were found innocent or be it a technical violation that could have been remedied at the local parole office level. Until the power this parole board exacts on prisoners or parolees comes under some form of scrutiny, some form of oversight, and most definitely some form of accountability, we are going to continue to have full prisons and they are going to continue to destroy lives farther.<BR/>....and you don't even want to get me started on CO's.<BR/>Bottom line...the parole board is broken and until our legislatures, who are elected officials, take this parole board to task and stop the insanity we will continue to see lives destroyed, we will continue to see people denied parole over and over again, no mater how rehabilitated they have made themselves, and we will continue to have over crowded prisons.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-74090372288545378572007-04-23T01:13:00.000-05:002007-04-23T01:13:00.000-05:00Texas simply HAS to stop this happening! Would peo...Texas simply HAS to stop this happening! <BR/><BR/>Would people lose their jobs (I'm talking COs, probations officers etc) if visible protests were held? Days of action? Work to rule? There has to be something you can do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com