tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post6300920358103981335..comments2024-03-25T20:06:39.794-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: Prosecutors seek to thwart post-conviction innocence claimsGritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-28133844317213010372015-03-02T08:10:50.773-06:002015-03-02T08:10:50.773-06:00I could not agree more .thank you david n austin.....I could not agree more .thank you david n austin..for seeing the way things r and recognizing the truth .I was beginning to think I was alone with these thoughts .. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-64666815889301770402015-03-02T07:56:27.135-06:002015-03-02T07:56:27.135-06:00BULLSHIT .you are fooled .That is exactly what it ...BULLSHIT .you are fooled .That is exactly what it is about .Thats exactly what they trying to do.What makes you think they care about where the hell their gona put it .That is so totally not the problem or job .There problem is that X amount of years ago they did a rush job on a case and juz grab the first person on the street passing by and with no evidence of guilt but was proof of innocence( they were fully aware of,)and,scared,coerced,treatened,bullyed,lied ,twisted,him into signing their agreement so they wouldnt be late for coctails with the boys at the remington..,after forgettting even the name of the person they ruined the life of , suddenly POPS bac up and is attempting to bring all u stashed away not remembering exactly what u done to the case what uve forged or stashed thinking at the time noone would ever see it,now no tellings who is going to have their hands eyes on ur rush job, digging up dirt.you know you could get in trouble if u done this or didnt do that or y did u leave that in the file or y didnt I juz do my job and uphold the oath I gave and help the VICTIM by putting the actuall assalant away and work to find the truth the proper way.omg omg omg .YES OFCOURSE THEY R GOING TO HIDE THEIR RUSHED WORK .IT COULD LAND THEM IN THE PLACE THEYVE SENT THE INNOCENT EVEN THO ITS WHERE THEY BELONG BCUZ WE TRUST THEM .THEY R THE GUILTY.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-26374697601187822942015-03-02T07:20:43.620-06:002015-03-02T07:20:43.620-06:00Ok anonymous try this on and see if it fits....Inv...Ok anonymous try this on and see if it fits....Investigation :1st stage: Suspect asked to give a DNA sample to prove hes innocent of sexual assault to be compared to DNA that a rape kit recovered from victim.Accused gladly summits DNA was told 6-12 weeks results will be bac .If you dnt match.We will move on. STAGE 2: Accused gets arrested next day..sits in jail sits in jail sits in jail.while eagerly awaiting results to return to set him free ..Attemps to contact attorney( paid) to inquire about results.again and again.numerous failed attempts.FINALLY 8 months later (still in jail) Attorney visits with guess wat ? DNA results in hand.Accused thinking finally im getting out .Attorney says YOU R IN NO WAY A MATCH ,EXCLUDED OF THE POSSIBILITY.then boom but the D.A is not dismissing your almost guaranteed a life sentence if you fight this.and I need more money to defend u in a trial and ur family says they have no more so .D.A has a plea to offer?its ur only option.From a legal point of veiw in ur situation I strongly advise you to accept..NO JUDGE ,NO COURTROOM,NO OATH ,convicted lifetime sex offender signed his life away with all partys involved knowing he was innocent .Why? Idk. how? Idk..oh and now 10 years later,find out results returned to D.A which gave attorney a copy 5 months prior to The day life was signed away.NOW why would they let a person sit in jail even after his proof of innocence came bac? Why would the D.A even thinking about a plea deal? Why did he just not Dismiss the charges and let him free and try to find the real perp? Wat could be so valuable to persuade the officials to break their oath to protect and serve not only the false imprisoned but the victim as well and to fight for justice ,wat could be their motivation to throw their morals ,compassion,human dignity out the window and how do they sleep at night.i strongly doubt that laziness is preventing them from WORK nd catching the True perp, so could it be perhaps something to do with money ? :-) ..so wats is ur solution to ,if dna has already been collected ,tested ,and ,excluded as a match ,BEFORE conviction ?and can u honestlly say u would NOT have plead ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-75965085146828626552013-08-27T05:54:07.431-05:002013-08-27T05:54:07.431-05:00I am one who pled not guilty. I watched lie after ...I am one who pled not guilty. I watched lie after lie and defense presented no evidence, no witness. Despite over two hundred documents showing prior statements other acts of fraud, criminal accusations against family members the claims were turned down for prosecution and defense counsel la te da was to busy to review or present on pice of evidence. Despite police interview showing inconsistency, despite civil,divorce counsel showing twelve different renditions, three conflicting statements under oath,dispute no examination of medical evidence, despite pre existing condition of injury, despite two years of wearing a monitor, being accused of violating a protective order and time after time finding the gps said it was not true and most of all being arrested for a PO violation at the exact same time as I was standing in front of the magistrate then having the defense counsel realize he did not investigate, he had admitted on the record he did not interview witnesses and conducted no investigation, badgered, lied and coerced a plea at sentencing that served only him and not his client. After untold infliction of mental cruelty including convincing daughter to attempt police report claiming sexual assault that investigation found suspicious and without merit, and then withholding police report to get a protective order, despite the youngest daughter who happened to be eye witness and was under pending indictment for threatening mom and sisters with a handgun requiring police intervention to disarm her, despite factual innocence from a know prescription drug addict who, in evidence fold the er into giving more narcotics, despite the victim administering the narcotic to the alleged perp after surgery without his knowledge knowing he reacted badly to the drug as sworn on the victims statement the defense attorney convinced a completely discouraged worn out man to plea, against his protests to assault for ten years probation with the promise he could go back to his family in another state because he was in danger in texas after being assaulted three times by two men in the court parking garage on camera with multiple eye witnesses only to have the charges against them dropped in the interest of justice he took the plea after finding of guilt in bench trial to try and stop the insanity. Trade places and see if you want that kind of "cowboy justice" for you or a ,ember of your family who marries a sociopath. Crap, what are you thinking?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-87890041859402373692009-11-06T11:26:34.664-06:002009-11-06T11:26:34.664-06:00I was forced to except a plea bargain back in 2002...I was forced to except a plea bargain back in 2002 only because the prosecutors for el paso county were allowed to use charges that they know i didn't commit as a means of stacking to secure a convictions. No one wanted to listen to my pleas for harrassment from the texas rangers and the investigators at fort bliss. Even though I had in my possession an arson investigation report that was clearly flawed. my attorney advised me to take the plea or the harrassment would continue. I look at this report all the time and I wonder how many other innocent individuals are forced to take plea bargains because they don't have the money to properly fight a case or hire an attorney who won't sell their souls to the prosecuting attorney as a favorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-86835775669736042982009-10-27T22:22:00.651-05:002009-10-27T22:22:00.651-05:00Perjury is allowed in Harris county court! Two wom...Perjury is allowed in Harris county court! Two women were allowed by prosecutors to tell over 150 inconsistent statements to wrongfully convict a innocent man. http://americaswrongfullyconvicted.com/robert_mcclendon.htmAWChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09526489781094973133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-30858810720696253132009-10-25T22:07:38.347-05:002009-10-25T22:07:38.347-05:00Report: UK police categorize political activists a...Report: UK police categorize political activists as ‘domestic extremists’<br /><br />http://rawstory.com/2009/10/report-uk-police-categorize-political-activists-domestic-extremists/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-6184365558504816042009-10-23T15:52:12.872-05:002009-10-23T15:52:12.872-05:00Anonymous at 3:30pm wrote:
"...here are more...Anonymous at 3:30pm wrote:<br /><br />"...here are more than 15,000 innocent people locked up in Texas, and more than 75,000 innocent people in Texas who are either locked up, on probation, or on parole."<br /><br />Huh? Grits article doesn't say that...oops, nevermind, I see it in the comments after the article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-16053620716982259752009-10-23T14:29:17.757-05:002009-10-23T14:29:17.757-05:00To 10:17:00 AM
NO, in real life, defendants are no...To 10:17:00 AM<br />NO, in real life, defendants are not placed under any friggin oath. In the "Information" there is fine print that the judge doesn't allow the defendant to read, the word Not Guilty is crossed out, and "No Contest" is wrote in black ink. <br /><br />The problem is that 95% of the time the attorney pusses out and plays along with his boyfriend the ADA. <br /><br />100% of the time the attorney declines to inform the defendant that when he goes in to the judge's chamber's (AKA: Open Court) to sign plea papers, he's really pleading Guilty and bargained away rights to appeal. <br /><br />Now the boyfriend wants to destroy evidence of a relationship and file charges against anyone that dares to grow a pair. <br /><br />FYI, you can burn books til you puke, but the stinch will remain on your clothes while we print more. Bradley will go away when Perry is booted.NoMoreNoloContenderenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-62151614649682264972009-10-23T13:57:59.330-05:002009-10-23T13:57:59.330-05:00To the Assitant District Attorney, AKA: "Anon...To the Assitant District Attorney, AKA: "Anonymous" that's pissing all over the place. You might not know it but you have two personalities. You anons. all look alike but it's clear one of you is on the clock.(exempt status or retired?) <br /><br />One is logical by saying stuff like, let the juries do their jobs and if you are not guilty don't plead. Then you go way left and sound like a tard. We all know by now where you work (just not sure which floor) yet? <br /><br />Please consider keeping up the logical rant. Let us all know how you feel about it being mandatory (once voir dire is completed) that all cases must proceed to jury. Thus, once a jury is seated, it's on, no one gets to tap out. Please refrain from throwing a friggin wrench in the mix.NoMoreNoloContenderenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-11844067915894060582009-10-23T05:52:55.201-05:002009-10-23T05:52:55.201-05:00Sorry, guys, but it isn't just Texas. Up here ...<i>Sorry, guys, but it isn't just Texas. Up here in America's Hat, they call it 'black catting'. They handcuff you in the cruiser (handcuffs as safety belt) and take you for a drive until you agree to confess, braking for every black cat they see. Lots of black cats up here, and they really blend in with the snow ;)</i><br /><br />Well isn't that ironic, down here we exclude "Canadians" from our juries.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-29544078122903395862009-10-22T23:21:25.717-05:002009-10-22T23:21:25.717-05:00To Anonymous at 10/19/2009 09:15:00 PM:
You gotta...To Anonymous at 10/19/2009 09:15:00 PM:<br /><br />You gotta be f'ing kidding us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-53130735968394919872009-10-22T16:14:37.492-05:002009-10-22T16:14:37.492-05:00Suppose the DA has a mountain of evidence of guilt...Suppose the DA has a mountain of evidence of guilt in a brutal capital offense but it would take 3 weeks to put on all that evidence in a death penalty trial. Plus another week for future dangerousness and mitigation during the punishment phase. Now suppose the defendant wants to accept a plea bargain for Life Without Parole. Finally suppose the DA knows the judge isn't willing to sit through a 3 week plea just to hear testimony of how guilty this guy is but at the same time the DA needs to get this mountain of evidence into the court's record so it is available to defend the conviction against inevitable future fraudulent writs proclaiming innocence.<br /><br />Option A: Plea agreement includes waiver of appeal, destruction of evidence, etc.<br />Option B: DA refuses to waive jury trial and defendant is sentenced to death.<br /><br />If we remove the possibility of Option A we'll just get more of OptionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-37749872595830045402009-10-22T15:21:46.301-05:002009-10-22T15:21:46.301-05:00Hey Scott, Great peice that deserves follow-up con...Hey Scott, Great peice that deserves follow-up consideration. <br /><br />It looks like you and a few others have already taken to task those in need.<br /><br />To me; Destroying the DNA evidence used to obtain a plea bargained rape conviction, is the same as, seeking to destroy faked or planted exhibits, case files, police records, notes and photos used to obtain a plea bargained robbery conviction. Texas owns enough property to store evidence used to convict for at least 10 years after the date of being released from parole. <br /><br />Collecting and introducing (any and all) evidence in a criminal matter resulting in an arrest and indictment and listed as a State's Exhibit, shouldn't be admissible without an investigation showing testing and or confirmation that the evidence shows guilt beyond any and all doubts. <br /><br />If there's enough so-called evidence, then plea bargaining shouldn't be allowed in the room. What the hell are friggin juries for? We all know who pays the $80K per year everytime DNA and or hidden police reports finally excludes someone. Just think if it was to exclude them before the trial. Na-too easy. Allowing prosecutors to go after the very ones they framed with plea bargains won't be tolerated.<br /><br />PROJECT: Not GuiltyNoMoreNoloContenderenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-40469035650274890852009-10-22T01:58:07.303-05:002009-10-22T01:58:07.303-05:00Sorry, guys, but it isn't just Texas. Up here...Sorry, guys, but it isn't just Texas. Up here in America's Hat, they call it 'black catting'. They handcuff you in the cruiser (handcuffs as safety belt) and take you for a drive until you agree to confess, braking for every black cat they see. Lots of black cats up here, and they really blend in with the snow ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-62268909830254716302009-10-21T22:06:02.320-05:002009-10-21T22:06:02.320-05:00Mr. or Mrs. Bradley?? Anonymous?? 9:15pm
sounds l...Mr. or Mrs. Bradley?? Anonymous?? 9:15pm<br /><br />sounds like you should be his next campaign chairman?<br /><br />I guess you've really never had a loved one or close friend involved with our Texas system of justice? Until you do I doubt you will have the understanding or compassion you need to make it better. Bradley has no more balls than the next politician. He's in a POWER position where putting people away with coerced and forced plea deals and arm twisting scare tactics only moves him higher up on that political power ladder. Is that called "ego" or "megalomania"? Not sure, but the majority of politicians are infected with it.<br /><br />Our Texas system is indeed f'd up! You'll never see it until you're on the other side of it - the accused - it's stacked against you from the start - overwhelmingly - especially in "hickish" backward counties like Williamson - GUILTY until proven innocent!<br /><br />How do you reconcile the fact that Bradley only recommended 2 yrs State jail time and 10 yrs probation to an Williamson County cop, Jimmy Fennel, that used his uniform and his authority to kidnap and RAPE an innocent woman?? Hmmm? (since you say he's out their bashing the criminal element with his "nuts" - ouch!!) What would you feel like if that "sicko" cop had stopped you? Would you feel that Mr. Bradley had recommended appropriate justice if that had been you?<br /><br />It's f'd up - he just put my dearest loved friend and roommate away for 15yrs in TDC on a low level substance abuse probation violation. Scaring and forcing him into a shitty plea deal cause his Public Defender didn't defend him; He seemed like he was Bradley's and Carne's best golfing buddy! My friend is totally non-violent, wouldn't steal a stick of gum from a store, a peaceful, quiet, artist with a mental illness; never hurt anyone nor ever would hurt anyone. He's been the first to jump to the aid of anyone needing help. He just chose to put something in his OWN body that made him feel good and help him deal with his illness. This so called "compassionate" DA showed no compassion whatsoever in treatment. No consideration that without access to mental health care MOST mental health defendants are most likely self medicating their illness. In other words, put those poor, small time drug abusers that can't afford a private atty to prison. Offer the bad cops a sweet deal. Kinda twisted if you ask most people. Luckily the Judge (Carnes) threw out the plea and sentenced him to a much stiffer length of time in prison (I'm no fan of Carnes). Get this Anonymous; my friend is in for 5 yrs longer than Fennel is. A violent, sick, sexually deviant rapist that needs to be off the street. How do you explain it? F'D UP FOR SURE!!<br /><br />Anyway, back on subject here - destroying DNA evidence and using unethical tactics to force less fortunate defendants into bad plea deals is not JUSTICE!! Forcing them to "sign away" their DNA evidence rights is not JUSTICE!! Utterly destroying totally non violent and good people's lives to improve his conviction record is not JUSTICE!! Gimme a break!!<br /><br />If he's so confident and interested in seeking true justice (as you state), of truly putting the right person away for the right crime (instead of putting the person away that fits the evidence), of keeping those really mean and violent criminals off your streets; it doesn't make sense he'd be against keeping DNA evidence.<br /><br />Oh, why do you "conservatives" always have to bring your religion into everything?? MY GOD!!!!! Keep it to yourselves. It's about truth and justice for all, not just the powerful and well connected or the ones that are "Godly". The Legi needs to draft a law preventing the destruction of DNA evidence!David N Austinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-9872343383306747852009-10-21T18:50:57.897-05:002009-10-21T18:50:57.897-05:00Sure there are, 3:39, if you don't believe it ...Sure there are, 3:39, if you don't believe it just ask them!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-74405323971395448942009-10-21T15:39:48.371-05:002009-10-21T15:39:48.371-05:00Karo babbled :
"Most of the post-conviction ...Karo babbled :<br /><br />"Most of the post-conviction writs clogging up the courts are baseless garbage filed by bored prisoners....blah, blah, blah...)<br /><br />Are you smoking crack? There are more than 15,000 innocent people locked up in Texas, and more than 75,000 innocent people in Texas who are either locked up, on probation, or on parole.<br /><br />https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8597101&postID=5520542068522661099Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-14020544914574705002009-10-20T16:29:26.402-05:002009-10-20T16:29:26.402-05:00"Nonetheless, the public understands that the..."Nonetheless, the public understands that the overall safety of society is the greater good-- some inefficiency notwithstanding.<br />------------------------------------<br /><br />And that inefficiency will be fine with YOU until they throw your stupid ass in WHITE for something you didn't do. This is EXACTLY whats wrong with Texas. The law and order morons will accept some "inefficiency" which is why we have 40+ DNA exonerations, not to mention the NON-DNA offenders released because of liars and cheats wearing robes and suits and even badges!!Hook Em Hornshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04660612847019528535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-40838980007464664882009-10-20T15:47:57.635-05:002009-10-20T15:47:57.635-05:003:24 writes: "For once, I'd like to see G...3:24 writes: "For once, I'd like to see Grits step up to the plate and inform the readers exactly what standards he feels should be imposed before someone who's pled guilty should be allowed to open up a conviction? And more importantly, what's it going to cost the taxpayers?"<br /><br />On the first question, there's no need for me to articulate standards. There are already plenty in place. All I've advocated in this post is not destroying evidence or requiring waivers of scientific testing, e.g., so those standards can actually be applied in the real world. There are elaborate rules in place about when defendants can get DNA testing, but if the evidence is destroyed they can't be applied.<br /><br />As for cost, in most cases I'm aware of the defendant paid for testing. It usually doesn't come out of taxpayers' pockets.<br /><br />Nobody said prosecutors WANT to convict innocent people, just that the state tolerates sloppy evidence and investigative techniques that make it likely innocent people will be convicted. Those problems can't be improved without identifying and discussing them openly. But for some people, like yourself, it appears see no evil hear no evil will always be good enough. IMO Texas deserves better.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-31240330013304954942009-10-20T15:24:40.981-05:002009-10-20T15:24:40.981-05:00Have any of you "bleeding hearts" ever s...Have any of you "bleeding hearts" ever stopped to consider exactly what, if anything, there is to be gained by prosecuting an innocent person? Lord knows, there are more guilty ones out there than prosecutors can keep up with now. I've got a news flash for y'all: Crime really does happen in Texas! People get murdered, women get raped, children really do get molested, etc.. Prosecutors, or at least all the ones I know, want to see the real criminals get apprehended and punished. It serves no public purpose for the wrong people to be prosecuted. The problem is that 99.9% of the criminals in prison will tell you they're innocent. And they have nothing better to do than sit around concocting clever schemes to get out. Whatever meritorious claims of innocence exist, frequently get lost in the mountains of frivolous crap that writ writers put out. And I think most folks (with good sense, at least) are rightly skeptical when some convict who has pled guilty now claims he's innocent. Not to say that false guilty pleas don't happen, but if you can't take a guy's word for it (under oath) that he did it, what more do you have to have. <br /><br />In the last few months since I've been reading this blog, the following types of evidence have all been criticized for one reason or another: DNA (see Houston P.D. Crime Lab), photo lineups, eyewitness identifications, fingerprint analysis, confessions, testimony of co-defendants, jailhouse snitches, arson forensics, ballistics, scent line-ups by dogs, testimony of undercover narcotics officers, consensual searches, testimony of child victims and now GUILTY PLEAS! Is there any type of proof or level of evidence out there that will convince any of you liberals that someone actually did commit a crime??? Because, believe you me, there really are real victims out there who deserve justice!!!<br /><br />What is effectively being advocated on this forum is the crippling of our criminal justice system. Guess what? Our criminal justice system is not perfect and it's never going to be perfect. You can throw as much money at it as you like (money that could be going to feed the hungry, clothe the poor, educate our children or solve the health care crisis) but you're still going to have the human element in the system that is prone to error. For once, I'd like to see Grits step up to the plate and inform the readers exactly what standards he feels should be imposed before someone who's pled guilty should be allowed to open up a conviction? And more importantly, what's it going to cost the taxpayers? Where's the money going to come from? If you want to tax our country into socialism, I'd suggest that you look at China and see how fair things are in that country for individuals who are charged with crimes. If anarchy is what you're advocating, well,...maybe given the expansion of the concealed carry law in Texas that wouldn't be such a bad thing! <br /><br />At any rate, for all the criticism that occurs on this board, the bottom line is, unfortunately, the bottom line. It's real easy to criticize. It's a far different thing to offer real solutions and pay for them. <br /><br />At the end of the day, the people of this state have a fairly low tolerance for people who commit crimes. And they understand that there is a certain amount of inefficiency in the system (just like there is in health care, air travel, highway transit, etc.) and that inefficiency will sometimes hurt innocent people. Nonetheless, the public understands that the overall safety of society is the greater good-- some inefficiency notwithstanding. <br /><br />Wake up, people. The system really does get it right way more often than not. 40 exhonerations is bad but that number is infinitesimal compared to the millions who have been rightly convicted in this state. The black helicopters really aren't coming to get you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-41394869424167124442009-10-20T12:57:40.804-05:002009-10-20T12:57:40.804-05:00Anon. 9:15 - "What Bradley is doing is prosec...Anon. 9:15 - "What Bradley is doing is prosecuting false statements made by defendant's who violate that promise to God to tell the truth, then when they think better of their guilty plea (because they are guilty and don't like prison), they concoct their writs and plans that clog the system."<br /><br />No, what Bradley is doing is intimidating people into not attempting to get a remedy they are entitled to under the law. He is a bully. And Williamson County is not posterchild for fair justice.Mandynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-58121955150590394032009-10-20T12:29:41.606-05:002009-10-20T12:29:41.606-05:00Everyone has totally missed the boat on this. It&...Everyone has totally missed the boat on this. It's a matter of storage--because everything, and I mean every single piece of physical evidence in every single felony case could potentially contain DNA evidence/biological material and so it would all have to be stored somewhere and stored in a manner where the DNA would not be degregated. Rember the warehouse scene at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark? No one is trying to hide innocence or destroy exculpatory evidence. Dude, you got to chill.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-16825250695143950112009-10-20T11:56:27.594-05:002009-10-20T11:56:27.594-05:00http://www.jackiebuffalo.com/whitebuffalo/InSwornA...http://www.jackiebuffalo.com/whitebuffalo/InSwornAffidavits.pdf<br /><br />This is all a hoot. Really the whole system is so totally corrupt, come on, now, right. Like there's really anything to debate.<br />These prosecutors are seeking to thwart post-conviction innocence claims, of course! They have worked so diligently to wear most of these people out, and they are the masters of their game, to make innocents take that bogus plea. I have never in my entire life met a bigger bunch of liars and name-callers. And if you don't go along with their lies, right there in the courtroom, and under oath, they will make sure you pay for it. <br />And those constables that are under investigation for treating people like chicken snakes? They can send their constables after you under the guise of an investigation while they really play a little cat & mouse game with you and your family. Ask Judge Foster how difficult it is to get someone to investigate claims of wrong-doing on the part of constables.jackie buffalohttp://www.jackiebuffalo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-7509573480348461722009-10-20T08:34:04.234-05:002009-10-20T08:34:04.234-05:00Most of the post-conviction writs clogging up the ...Most of the post-conviction writs clogging up the courts are baseless garbage filed by bored prisoners. These guys have a grudge against the justice system and nothing better to do so why not gum up the works. Not only do they waste everyone's time, the constant crying “Wolf!” drowns the meritorious claims of actual innocence and inure those officials responsible for evaluating such claims. <br /><br />Dissuading bogus writs is a worthy goal but surely stacking perjury convictions is a heavy-handed approach that could have a chilling effect for the rare few that are actually innocent.Karonoreply@blogger.com