tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post8100184696871212610..comments2024-03-25T20:06:39.794-05:00Comments on Grits for Breakfast: Two crimes solved by informants show snitching pros and consGritsforbreakfasthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8597101.post-60628116662493908962008-01-13T07:25:00.000-06:002008-01-13T07:25:00.000-06:00The cops certainly didn't set up Tennarse out of t...The cops certainly didn't set up Tennarse out of the blue. They had information -- from informants and witnesses -- about her drug dealing, but they refused to accept that information as incriminating evidence. If they'd been on the level, they'd have arrested her based on the evidence. Instead, they set up a sting, as if it's not a crime unless the cops witness it themselves.<BR/><BR/>But of course, they don't hold citizens to the same standards. No, they'll arrest people on the flimsiest evidence, and even get them sentenced to death solely on the basis of fraudulent testimony from a snitch.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com