In general, the report found that the public defender's office does more investigation, which leads to better results in court, advocates for the defense bar in community issues and offers free training, mentoring and advice that was not available before.The Chron's coverage quoted county GOP Chairman Jared Woodfill criticizing the higher cost per case at the PD compared to assigned counsel, but there are several mitigating factors behind those numbers that weren't fully clarified. First, HCPD enforces caseload caps consistent with American Bar Association guidelines while some assigned counsel far exceed those numbers. Plus, a disproportionate number of HCPD cases involve mentally ill defendants and are typically more complex than the average case. Finally, overhead costs are counted against the PD that are subsumed in judicial budgets for court coordinators, etc., for assigned counsel, making the comparison apples and oranges.
Those courtroom results include a greater proportion of dismissals, deferred sentences and acquittals. The report also pointed out that the office sees a smaller proportion of "guilty" verdicts than appointed lawyers. Overall, the public defender office secured acquittals at three times the rate of appointed or hired attorneys, according to the report.
Otherwise, looking through the report, here are a few highlights that jumped out at me:
"[W]ith few exceptions, public defender attorneys delivered better defense results than assigned counsel attorneys."
In Harris County as a whole, "plea bargaining is even more prevalent than elsewhere and sentencing outcomes are more costly for the state, with Harris County overrepresented in prison and state jail commitments and under-represented in probation commitments."
For mentally ill offenders accused of misdemeanors, HCPD's mental health division "achieves significantly higher dismissal rates (38 percent versus 10 percent) and lower conviction rates (70 percent versus 92 percent) compared to assigned counsel." "Dismissals were five times more likely for HCPD clients than for the match group" of assigned counsel, even though HCPD is assigned "more severe cases" than the typical assigned counsel.
"HCPD's total caseload is set at 5,075 while the total Harris County indigent caseload for FY 2012 was almost 72,000."
On felony cases, "Not only did HCPD clients have fewer findings of guilt than appointed attorneys, the office was far more likely to take its cases to trial than appointed counsel or retained counsel. And once at trial, HCPD clients were more likely to get acquittals for all changes, 22 percent of HCPD clients who were tried were found not guilty and did not face a new trial."
"HCPD and retained counsel are more likely to achieve dismissal of weak cases, where appointed counsel is more likely to plead them down."
"Competent and diligent representation demands more effort than minimal per-case or per-docket payment tends to support. Anecdotal reports suggest that in many court-appointed cases, particularly misdemeanors, counsel reads the offense report and takes a plea offer back to the client. Absent a glaring defect in the state’s case, the attorney recommends, and the client usually accepts, the prosecutor’s offer. Simply calling a witness, or doing some basic legal research, may make the difference between this result and a dismissal, further investigation, or a better plea offer. Small acts of due diligence in defending a case can dramatically change results." (Emphasis in original.)
Among cases processed through the county's "wheel" system, "the top 10 percent of attorneys were assigned over 452 cases annually (with an average of 632 cases and the highest at 952 cases). There were 32 attorneys who received more than 400 cases, 6 of whom received more than 400 in one court." About 45% of assigned cases are handled by attorneys whose caseloads exceed American Bar Association standards. By contrast, HCPD has established caseload caps consistent with ABA standards.
"[T]he public defender office can bring specific, targeted expertise to the table, such as representation of the mentally ill, successful appellate advocacy, advice to the criminal bar on issues such as a conviction's impact on immigration status, as well as the ability to help respond to systemic issues" such as the Jonathan Salvador debacle at the DPS-Houston crime lab.
Harris County pays assigned counsel "considerably less per case than other urban counties in the state," especially for misdemeanors where "the payout per case is about two-thirds of the large county average." Here's a chart depicting rates in Texas' five largest counties.
"Evaluation of assigned counsel is needed," declared the report. While "there has been a marked emphasis on evaluating public defenders, [there has been] very little focus on the workload or performance of the assigned counsel system." Given the preponderance of cases with assigned counsel, their "performance should be subjected to comparable or greater evaluation effort. As stated by Professor Lefstein (see text accompanying footnote 1), 'When adequate oversight of assigned counsel programs is lacking, the lawyers, in an effort to maximize their incomes, sometimes accept too many cases because they are poorly compensated on a per-case basis for their services.'"
"HCPD has presented a total of 63 accredited Continuing Legal Education (CLE) programs since its inception: 7 programs in 2011, 39 programs in 2012 and 17 programs so far in 2013. Total documented attendance at the programs was 1,868 attorneys at no cost to attendees."
Grits, if we go to any of the links provided, would we see the names of the assigned (used to be called appointed)& the names of the judges?
ReplyDeleteAsking due to - About 45% of assigned cases are handled by attorneys whose caseloads exceed American Bar Association standards. There is no way in hell that they are Investigating more cases with these numbers.
Anyone that believes that they are Investigating "more" is easily fooled.
*If any part of the "Report" is based in fact(s), and the numbers are close to being real, should we re-consider the Texas TappOut Rate to better coiencide?
ReplyDeleteAs it is now, they actually celibrate the 97% plea bargain rate as if it was something to be proud of. And they think that that the public is okay with mass plea parties that puts everyone on probation (guilty or not).
Mr. Bunin, (Alex) if they are actually Investigating more cases than before, then would it be safe to say that -
ReplyDelete*RE: Applicants' filing for a Full Pardon - for / based on innocence.
When the BPP instructs Applicants' to purchase certified case file copies from the district clerk's office and the Police Incident Report, would the files contain any proof of an actual Investigation being performed inconjunction with the Police Report? Or is is this just something the public should trust and believe?
Your Office (any Office) can pass out information to researchers working on a Report, but without any materials to back it up, simply just makes those of us that had felony cases that were NOT Investigated by anyone at anytime question claims of improvement.
In Harris County as a whole, "plea bargaining is even more prevalent than elsewhere and sentencing outcomes are more costly for the state, with Harris County overrepresented in prison and state jail commitments and under-represented in probation commitments."
ReplyDeleteWhich is exactly why, Harris County residents should be taxed an additional Tuff on Crime Tax to force open the sleepy, chemical plant induced eyes of the put 'em all away crowd. Why does the rest of the state just let Harris County roll all over them & happily pick up their portion of the monster tab?
There is no way of knowing how many cases the PD is handling without verification. Studies should not be based simply on the numbers they report they are handling.
ReplyDeleteThere are attorneys unofficially working in multiple divisions.