Sunday, February 21, 2010

US Attorney should step in if Dallas DA won't pursue allegedly corrupt constables

I agree with most of what the Dallas News had to say in this editorial yesterday calling for District Attorney Craig Watkins to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes and abuses by Dallas County constables. Opined the News:

As Watkins is quick to point out, if anyone is going to investigate allegations that county constables broke the law, it's going to be him and his office. By statute, that's his call, and he won't be pushed into anything by any county commissioners or outside critics. No special prosecutors or Attorney General's Office busybodies need apply.

So get to work, Mr. DA.

The Defenbaugh report relies on the sworn affidavits of 23 constable's deputies and clerks and other county employees, all obtained without subpoena power. The absence of subpoena power, you'll recall, was one of Watkins' many specific objections to County Judge Jim Foster and other commissioners deciding to hire Defenbaugh to conduct a civil investigation into Cortes and Precinct 1 Constable Derick Evans.

Watkins correctly notes that only his office had such subpoena power and either was – or wasn't – working its own investigation into the same allegations raised by Cortes and Evans employees. Sadly, it was next to impossible to get a straight answer from the district attorney, which is what forced the commissioners to act. Remember, these allegations supposedly hit Watkins' office in June; commissioners didn't vote to hire Defenbaugh until Sept. 1. (His preliminary report on Evans is not yet complete.)

Anyone who chooses to read the Defenbaugh report on Cortes will learn that what began as allegations of a shady relationship with a towing company now spirals into accusations of bribery, kickbacks, official oppression against employees and an unusually sweet deal for one of his deputies identified as his "paramour."

All obtained without subpoena power. Imagine that.

Instead of battling commissioners tit-for-tat with lawsuits and fast-and-loose handling of grand jury testimony, Watkins, who again declined last week to discuss the matter, has real work to do now. Since he played the constable situation from the start as a political issue, rather than a criminal case, he now resides in a small box.

The way out is to bring a criminal prosecution. That's about it. Replicate the sworn interviews with Defenbaugh's team to satisfy the standards needed for a criminal trial and use that well-guarded subpoena power to compel other witnesses. It's a shame voters weighing the Cortes and Evans re-election bids in the March 2 primaries won't get an answer in time, but that clearly wasn't the DA's concern.

Still, if Cortes and/or Evans ever face justice, everyone who reads the Defenbaugh report can suspect that Watkins and his office never would have gotten there without a blatant shove from county commissioners.

I differ from the News on just two points. First, perhaps they should be urging acting Northern District US Attorney James Jacks, not Craig Watkins, to look into allegations of public corruption. After all, if the DA wanted to pursue these cases, he'd have done so long before now.

Second, the News accurately says Watkins painted himself into a political box, then declares "The way out is to bring a criminal prosecution." But I don't care how much political trouble he's in, the DA shouldn't pursue prosecutions just to get himself out of a political jam, but only if there's a legitimate case to be made (which from the Defenbaugh report, there appears to be). That's another good argument why the US Attorney should step in; the DA has backed himself into a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't position that threatens to leave a cloud over the matter regardless of the outcome.

Whether this feud between the DA and the Commissioners Court is as petty and ego-driven as it appears from the outside, or whether there's some darker, subterranean reason Watkins wouldn't pursue these cases, I cannot say. Going forward, though, Watkins' continued refusal to either act himself, bring in a special prosecutor or seek help from the Attorney General would threaten his long-term credibility in ways that just aren't worth it. Mr. Watkins needs to put the conflict behind him and admit the county judge was right to be concerned about the constables.

The Dallas Observer helpfully supplied a link to the full 92-page report. The constables themselves, of course, are denying every word. I've just skimmed the document, but it alleges overt corruption and abusive employment tactics (especially wringing deputies for campaign assistance) that really do need to be vetted for criminal wrongdoing - particularly allegations of kickbacks from towing contracts. If Watkins won't do it, the acting US Attorney should (or the new one, whenever Obama gets around to appointing them).

RELATED: Dallas County Judge seeks constable's civil removal.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why doesn't a credible person write a letter to the current grand jury foreman?

It is possible under Texas CCP 20.09.

Art. 20.09. DUTIES OF GRAND JURY. The grand jury shall inquire into all offenses liable to indictment of which any member may have knowledge, or of which they shall be informed by the attorney representing the State, or any other credible person.

The foreman also has authority under Texas CCP 20.10 to issue summons and attachments for any witnesses.

The attorney representing the state has a right to be present during the proceedings. The grand jury can question witnesses should the state's attorney choose to be present/not present.

Boyness said...

**yawns** What? Corruption in Texas? Surely not. What? Local officials wont do anything? Come on this isn't Louisiana. TEXAS IS A JOKE!!!!!!!!!!

Jackie said...

Northern District US Attorney James Jacks should investigate. I believe Dallas has some subterranean undercurrents.
http://www.jackiebuffalo.com/index2copy.html

p.s. I support anyone reading Grits on tax payer's time.

Cynthia R said...

Corrupt Constables????
Check out McGregor:
Justice of the Peace, Frank Culpepper/Denied me a formal inquest after the suspicious death of my son, Joshua.
City Manager, David McDuffie resigned after the death.
Mayor Jimmy Hering/Attorney, knew about the questions I posed to McGregor PD, did nothing.
City Secretary,Mrs.Pascall, resigned after Josh's death.
Four of the five officers, on scene, resigned simultaneously, in June, 2006, for unknown reasons.
Former Chief Ron Wadkins, resigned Feb. 28, 2008. He also 'suggested' that I relocate.
The McLennan County DA told me to take my problem to the Justice of the Peace, and the JP told me to take my problem to the DA!
Why won't ANYONE give me the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?!

Anonymous said...

You better be careful saying bad things about Watkins, Grits. Barry Scheck and your liberal buddies over at IPOT are going to kick you out of the "Hug-a-Thug" Club for picking on their favorite prosecutor!

Gritsforbreakfast said...

Gee 1:51, do you think if they decide they don't like me they'll troll my blog making anonymous assholish comments? That'd be a real change of pace.

Anonymous said...

Barry Scheck. Wasn't he part of the "dream team" that got O.J. Simpson off after he hacked his wife's head off? Look it up.

Anonymous said...

One of the best Saturday Night Live episodes was the one with Barry Barry and O. J. Simpson.

Transcripts Season 23: Episode 6

Anonymous said...

Barry Scheck and O.J. He sure hugged that thug. And he's head of the Innocence Project telling us who is innocent!

Nicholas Sullivan said...

The attorney representing the state has a right to be present during the proceedings.

Auto Accident Attorney Houston

Anonymous said...

восстановление зрения
База кинофильмов, кино, фильмы, анимация, мультики
восстановление зрения

klip izle said...

dizi izle klip izle program klip izle klip izle