Saturday, March 19, 2011

Merging public safety oversight agencies a pointless exercise

Here's another budget cutting suggestion that to me amounts to little more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Reports Brandi Grissom at the Texas Tribune:
A money-saving proposal to combine state agencies that oversee police and firefighter training and local jail operations has public safety officials statewide worried about their future.

After Gov. Rick Perry’s budget proposal to fold the state's Commission on Jail Standards, the Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education, and the Commission on Fire Protection into one agency, state Rep. Jerry Madden, R-Plano, filed a bill last week that would do just that. The individual agencies would be abolished, and a new agency, the Public Safety Licensing Commission, would be formed to take over their roles.
What a pointless exercise! In the scheme of the state budget, these agencies' budgets barely qualify as a rounding error: About $6.5 million per year, between them, with $3.25 million going to TCLEOSE, $2.25 million to the Commission on Fire Protection, and just $1 million to the Commission on Jail Standards. And as others pointed out in Grissom's article, they all have quite different functions. You might save two or three administrative FTEs from HR or budget folks, but in short order I bet the need for middle management to patch over the competing missions under a single administrative structure would in practice make the project a wash, budget-wise. I doubt there's a million dollars in savings to be had, total, even if the merger could be accomplished on such short order with so little notice or planning.

Meanwhile, such a merger amounts to fiddling while Rome burns. The needless complexity of reorganizing these agencies - not as a result of a Sunset recommendation or any formal process but just because the Governor tossed the idea out - is too much of a distraction between the budget, redistricting and everything else that's going on.

Want to save money on public safety? Figure out how to actualize the Governor's recommended $786 million in cuts at TDCJ without gutting treatment and diversion programming. Make the proposed $363 million in cuts at DPS a reality without reducing numbers of troopers or lengthening waits at the driver license offices. It can be done, but not if state leaders spend their time chasing down penny ante rabbit trails like this one.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

what's in it for Madden?

Gritsforbreakfast said...

My guess is the Governor's folks asked him to carry it, and it's always good to have the Guv owe you a favor if you want your bills to not get vetoed.

Anonymous said...

Anyone heard any legislative proposals to have TABC merged into DPS?

Anonymous said...

Context answered the question for me, but it was confusing to have TDCJ cited twice with two different amounts to be cut. I hadn't seen the DPS cut cited before.

Gritsforbreakfast said...

Fixed it, 6:29, just a typo. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

It's not about the money. It's about control.

Anonymous said...

What control would that be 7:25?

Anonymous said...

I've heard that TABC will be absorbed into DPS, but not the employees. I began looking for the bill pertaining to just that and ran across a proposal to combine the Lottery, ABC and a new "Gaming" function to be called the Texas Alcoholic Beverage, Lottery and Gaming Commission. Since gambling will never make it in Texas I know this bill is dead. At present, all employees at TABC are slated for layoff when the agency is abolished unless the new combined agency is created. And that would depend on gambling alone. I hear the Racing Commission is in the same boat as well. No slots at racetracks, no more racetracks and the agency closes. An insider told me they expect it to happen in June (closures).

Scott In South Austin said...

TCFP has a completely different mission than TCLEOSE and combining the staff doesn't make sense. TCFP is worried about the ability of folks to perform high-risk firefighting, technical rescue and hazardous materials response and mitigation. LEOs have completely different risk profiles to consider. These are competing interests.