I didn't like it for several reasons, not the least of which is needlessly filling up the prisons with old people that my granddaughter then must pay for. Anyway, LWOP gives too much power to prosecutors in their charging decisions (accept a plea or die) while making us little safer. And LWOP may encourage inmate misbehavior inside the prison by giving people nothing to lose. (A prison-guard commenter at TexasJustice.org noted that all five prisoners in the escape attempt at the Polunsky unit last year, including the three who were shot, were LWOP capital defendants.) Not to mention the growing costs of healthcare for the elderly in prison are so high that incarceration to the end of life, in the majority of cases, simply doesn't pass the cost-benefit test.
So this has never been my favorite Texas sentencing policy, even though observers say it's a partial contributor to Texas' recent decline in new death sentences. The latest report from the Houston Chronicle's Lise Olsen ("Nearly 400 capital murder convicts get life without parole," Nov. 29) confirms precisely Grits fears since the LWOP law was created:
In six years, Texas has built a "lifer's row" filled with 398 prisoners who will never be released through parole - a fast-growing group that already has outpaced the number of inmates serving a death sentence in the Lone Star State, a Houston Chronicle analysis of prison records shows.She could have added that the Legislature this year, regrettably if perhaps predictably, began to tack on life without parole sentences for non-capital crimes as well.
Harris County prosecutors, who historically have led the state in seeking death sentences, have so far also been the most aggressive in pursuing capital murder charges and obtaining mandatory life without parole sentences in capital cases.
Texas became the last of the death penalty states to approve life without parole in September 2005, after Harris County prosecutors dropped their opposition to the change. The law applies only to offenders convicted of capital murder.
Texas actually has far fewer "lifers" incarcerated in TDCJ compared to many other large states, both with and without the chance for parole - e.g., at last count, around 6% of Texas prisoners were serving life sentences, compared to about 20% in California.
Grits considers the expansion of LWOP sentences and life sentences generally, coupled with the failure to adequately fund prisoner healthcare, as part of a growing Californication of the Texas prison system, putting us on a track that, in the medium-to-long term, finds TDCJ butting heads with US Attorneys and federal judges, an experience corrections veterans in Texas will perhaps not entirely pleasantly recall from the days of Judge William Wayne Justice's rule over TDCJ from the federal bench. As old-timers at TDCJ or California's current prison mandarins would tell you, this is an outcome to be avoided at all costs, not blithely courted. It's an area where, when the state can't handle its own business, the feds eventually handle it for you, then pass on to the state a (much higher) bill.
Do I expect any current Texas leader to seek to reverse this trend? Probably not. The public may even support handing out more life sentences, in theory, even if in practice they don't favor paying for the costs of a bloated prison system. healthcare for elderly inmates, or for that matter passing those costs onto their grandkids 40 years from now. But as a Johnny-come-lately to the LWOP entourage, Texas still has the option of dissociating itself from this ill-conceived corrections fad before the nascent policy, as it has in California, gets seriously out of hand. With Corrections Chair Jerry Madden and several other reform-minded legislators headed out the door, I don't know who might emerge as a champion on that score. But the state could sure use one.
RELATED: From October, see "Bubble in expanding life sentences, LWOP driving TDCJ health costs for older inmates." ALSO: See a comprehensive report (pdf) from the Sentencing Project from 2009 on the explosion of life sentences nationwide.)
8 comments:
Hope Texas has the wisdom to give up LWOP. The Feds don't like prison overcrowding, and I don't see the state raising revenue for more prisons without a fight.
Please justify your comment that prosecutors "abetted" the creation of LWOP by the legislature. For years prosecutors opposed LWOP and were dogged by the media and anti-death penalty crowd for it. Ultimately most prosecutors stopped fighting and just backed out of the debate entirely. But I don't recall any prosecutors actively pushing for LWOP. Talk about damned if you do and damned if you don't!
11:17, LWOP was a deal cut between prosecutors - especially the Harris County DA - and the anti-death penalty crowd, it's not true they just "stopped fighting."
If they really don't care, they wouldn't mind adding back in the w/parole option, which has always been my preference - to offer all three options.
LWOP not only costs the taxpayers money to house and provide healthcare to prisoners, it costs society as a whole. For every prisoner in a Texas jail, there are family members who are also paying that price. Families end up on welfare, children are put in foster care or maybe even in jail themselves.
Granted there are lots of people in prison who are dangerous and should stay locked up. However, having a parole hearing at regular intervals to determine an incarcerated person's status shouldn't be that hard to do.
Parole at it's best is crappy but it sure beats staying in prison for a life time without a chance of ever seeing the outside again. I've seen what being incarcerated does to someone and it isn't pretty. Those for LWOP have never had someone close to them in prison. If they did, they would change their tune in a heartbeat.
For a state that beats the "Christian" drum and consistently thumps the Bible, Texas has forgotten it's teachings when it serves their purpose.
It goes back to the "tough on crime" attitude of law enforcement, the DA and the judges and how bad they can scare the public at election time. I sure hope that when their day of judgement comes they recognize the writing on the wall.
"Granted there are lots of people in prison who are dangerous..."
Not many of us will admit to this.
Surprise, surprise - the costs of confining inmates keep going up and up as they age.
As a strong advocate for the death penalty, I have long maintained that the shopworn argument that by abolishing the death penalty, the states would save millions of dollars is not true. If you compare the cost of keeping a condemned inmate on death row for 10 years - most of that cost coming from fighting endless appeals – to the cost of keeping him locked up for life, you will find that it cost the state more money to keep him locked up for, let’s say 30 years.
Thanks Grits for helping to make my case.
"A prison-guard commenter at TexasJustice.org noted that all five prisoners in the escape attempt at the Polunsky unit last year, including the three who were shot, were LWOP capital defendants."
For the record, the commenter at TJDO was in error. Only two of the five inmates are serving LWOP. The remaining three are lifers with parole dates, albeit far into the future.
TJDO
@11:17, I do recall that some in the Harris County DA's office opposed LWOP on the unfounded basis that prison officials would be unable to manage these inmates. As a former TDCJ warden, I was amused that someone in that office would assume how to manage inmates from a desk. In any event, emerging research is showing, nationally, that inmates serving LWOP are more easily managed than those serving less time. LWOP is sort of a reality therapy. Why cause trouble. Make the best of a bad situation and settle in.
TJDO
Post a Comment