Examining further materials from the Texas Youth Commission
request for proposals to provide contract care to incarcerated
kids aged 10-13, I was disappointed to read Exhibit K (
uploaded here) identifying how private residential facilities' performance would be measured. Residential contract compliance will be measured on these eight topic:
1. Percent Positive Releases
2. Percent Negative Releases
3. Escapes Per Year Per 10 Students
4. Percent Escapes
5. Felony Arrests Per Year Per 10 Students
6. Misdemeanor Arrests Per Year Per 10 Students
7. Confirmed Mistreatment Per Year Per 10 Students
8. Percent Early Movement [from the program within 30 days]
So basically they're measuring performance based on student misconduct
only if it's criminal, "confirmed" staff misconduct, and whether kids escaped or completed their incarceration term. (
See Exhibit K for definitions.)
Are those the only ways to measure a residential facility's success, especially one aimed at pre-teens? Those performance measures evaluate the warehousing function, but what about measuring whether contract care is meeting kids' needs?
How about meeting educational goals for kids? Where are the performance measures for that? What if a performance measure were the number of kids who left the facility able to read at their own grade level? That might be helpful.
Kids get a medical and psych evaluation when they first come to TYC. Shouldn't one of the performance measures for private facilities be to demonstrate whether kids received adequate treatment and counseling to address problems identified at intake? Shouldn't you measure that so facilities where kids aren't getting appropriate care don't have their contracts renewed?
For that matter, focusing only on "confirmed" abuse by staff leaves open the question of who's doing the confirming at private facilities, which often aren't very well monitored.
All abuse complaints should be reported as well as
the percentage that are confirmed. Similarly, there is lots of youth misconduct that doesn't result in arrests for misdemeanors and felonies, but these criteria indicate TYC doesn't care what the kids do so long as they're not arrested. Why only measure performance based on arrests?
I'm just spitballing here, but this list of performance measures to me seems woefully inadequate. I care about private facilities' performance on a much broader range of issues than these
narrow criteria would indicate.
This RFP has already been closed and bidders' proposals are all based on meeting the eight criteria named above. That could leave the state with an inferior product that supplies little oversight on the topics that really matter. What a mess.