Saturday, March 24, 2007

Saturday Morning Roundup

Here are a few recent Texas criminal justice news stories that caught my attention but I haven't found time to blog about:
Meanwhile, a few more items from outside of Texas also aroused my interest, and I thought I'd share them here:

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sorry, I can't feel any empathy for the poor parole officer who was treated so badly. I wonder how many parolees he himself treated badly. I wonder if he knows that prisoners in TDCJ are treated much worse on a daily basis and most often ignored in the courts. At least if Mr. Parole Officer didn't like the treatment he could choose to walk out...which he didn't. However, prisoners have no choice but to be abused on a routine basis with no ability to escape the torture. When one deals with TDCJ, when one knows about the horrible abuse, the lack of medical care, the daily racial and vulgar insults prisoners must endure routinely, and the lack of redress that these prisoners have...well, empathy or sympathy for anyone affiliated with TDCJ is something I am hard pressed to muster. What goes around comes around.

800 pound gorilla said...

The Snitch Society is a stark reminder of what happens in states like Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Mao - darling of liberals everywhere - had this down to an art form. Mao would encourage a form of public "brainstorming" and then would arrest those who thought way outside the box. Pretty soon you had a society where ideas were contained almost exclusively inside the box and free market reforms were impossible - to this day. Yes, Virginia, there is no free market in China: it's all done with cheap disposable labor - a model that GW aspires to emulate.

Anonymous said...

Abilene prosecutor withheld exculpatory evidence:

The CCA found that the Abilene prosecutors INTENTIONALLY withheld exculpatory evidence with the specific intent to avoid an acquittal.

Footnote 20 of the majority opinion says:

"20. In West, 451 A.2d at 1235, the Court stated that what "is encompassed by intentional misconduct . . . is not the mere general intent to do the act but, additionally, the special intent to attain some specific end thereby." West provides two situations where retrial after a defense-requested mistrial is jeopardy-barred under Oregon v. Kennedy. See West, 451 A.2d at 1235. The second, more familiar, situation is a mistrial when the prosecution intentionally commits some erroneous act with the specific intent to provoke or goad the defendant into moving for a mistrial to avert a probable acquittal. See id. The first, less familiar, situation is a mistrial when the prosecution attempts not to get caught intentionally committing some erroneous act (e.g., not disclosing evidence) with the specific intent to avoid a probable defeat. See id. The evidence in this case supports this latter situation.Also, recall that the State claimed at the mistrial hearing that there is no evidence that it "did this to goad [the defense] into asking for a mistrial, or that [it] knew that if [the defense] found this out that it would goad them into a mistrial." (Emphasis supplied)."

The misconduct of the prosecutors was so extreme that the CCA felt it met the difficult Oregon v. Kennedy standard for double jeopardy barred reprosecution.

The Taylor County prosecutors (including now Judge Robert Harper) all justified intentionally withholding exculpatory evidence by claiming they didn't know the defendant might call for a mistrial if he found out about the withheld evidence.

Even the dissenting opinions agree the prosecutors were..."wrong, wrong, wrong..." The prosecutors intentionally withheld exculpatory evidence "...not once, not twice, but three times..."

The majority opinion is at:

http://www.cca.courts.state.tx.us/OPINIONS/HTMLOPINIONINFO.ASP?OPINIONID=15153

Click below and search Masonheimer to read the dissenting opinions:

http://www.cca.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/handdown.asp?FullDate=20070321

Make sure to read the footnotes on all of these opinions.

When the Taylor County DA's Office has this attitude about withholding Brady evidence, is it possible for anyone get a fair trial in Taylor County?

Is anyone at the TDCAA paying attention?

chunxue said...

During the World War II, Art Deco jewellery was ugg sale a very popular style among women. The females started ugg boots wearing short dresses and cut their hair short. And uggs such boyish style was accessorized with Art Deco jewellery. They used cheap ugg boots long dangling earrings and necklaces, multiple bracelets and bold ugg boots uk rings.Art Deco jewellery has harshly geometric and symmetrical theme instead disocunt ugg boots of free flowing curves and naturalistic motifs. Art Deco Jewelry buy ugg boots today displays designs that consist of arcs, circles, rectangles, squares, and ugg outlet triangles. Bracelets, earrings, necklaces and rings are added with long ugg boots outlet lines and curves.One example of Art Deco jewelry is the Art Deco ring. Art Deco rings have ugg mall sophisticated sparkle and bold styles. These rings are not intended for a subtle look, they are meant to be noticed. Hence, these are perfect for people with bold styles.