That's the solution touted yesterday by the Austin Statesman editorial board ("Legislature should starve appeals court," Nov. 5). The idea is as provocative as it is justified, but also politically tone deaf. (The Statesman editorial board has suggested dismantling the court before.) There's just no political will at the Texas Legislature to starve out statewide GOP officeholders, even ones who've publicly disgraced themselves and the state the way the Court of Criminal Appeals has done. That doesn't mean they don't deserve it.
A better idea would have been for Democrats to run candidates agains these ne'er-do-wells and give voters a choice to toss the bums out. I've argued for years the Court of Criminal Appeals judges are the weakest link in Republicans' statewide political armor. This sure seems like it would have been a good year to test those weak spots, but D pessimists missed the opportunity. The public was ill-served by their abdication.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
.jpg)
2 comments:
Like I say, I'd rather just un-elect the bums, if somebody'd give me an option to do it.
The CCA does NOT play an "absolutely essential" function. Most states don't have one. Texas does because the ex-Confederates who wrote the state constitution knew the Union had made controlling each state's Supreme Court a priority, so they segregated Texas' criminal appeals from Yankee control so they could begin what became the Jim Crow practice of using the crmiminal justice system as a means of racial repression.
We don't need it. De-fund it. Abolish it. Whaterver. Let's just be done with it. Bad history. Bad present. Nothing but a bad future ahead if it continues.
Post a Comment